What In The World is This Animal In Bloomfield Township?

After this weekend’s picture of the alleged dead Chupacabra we have this set of photos.  What I am seeing is a fox that has shed its outer coat.  Notice the thinness of the tail and how the lack of fur lets the ears look larger.  It may even be a coyote but fox seems more likely.

 

Has the warm summer around the northern Hemisphere brought on a wave of shedding?  Possibly, since we are seeing more than one case.  The full molt argues against a simple skin disease which would show partial shedding.

 

One of these corpses that are in hand needs to be properly identified and we have plenty of biologists with the skills.

 

The Chupacabra appears to be a rare unrecognized vampire bat having the same mass as one of these foxes.  We actually have two unusual animals scaring the chickens.

 

What In The World is This Animal In Bloomfield Township

 

Updated: Friday, 06 Aug 2010, 10:36 PM EDT

Published : Friday, 06 Aug 2010, 10:19 PM EDT

((MyFoxDetroit.com Staff)) - Do you know what this is?  Joel from Bloomfield Township says this animal started showing up in his backyard yesterday.

He took a few photos and sent them to us to help identify the animal.  Please scroll through them.  We've sent them off to Veterinarian but until we hear back, what's your call?

Add your ideas in the comment box below.  We'll post the answers from the experts once we get them.  See if you're right.

UPDATE: Some quick research has our staff thinking it's a mangy fox or a coyote. Still, what do you think?

From James we have 

This animal is showing up all over the States... many of the nudnicks are calling it el chupacabra, okay... My thought is that there is more genetic splicing and cloning being done then we will ever know. For these things to be showing up all over the States, I don't know, just a bit too coincidental if you ask me.

If you think that there aren't Dr Frankenstein's out there as well as fully funded Government labs making new and trying to revive old animals you living with your head in the sand.

Every time they get a dead one they send it off for DNA testing and we never ever here anything about it again... it's also why when archeologists find anomalous artifacts the objects seem to vanish.... things like a 8000 year old human femur bone that is four feet long... or modern type tools embedded in coal a mile under the earth...fossilized modern human footprints that are right next to dinosaur footprints...

If you find these thing fascinating as I do, pick up "Forbidden Archeology" by Michael Cremo. It's a HUGE book and it will blow your mind to what they are hiding from us so not to upset the fake made up history that we have been fed and brainwashed to believe. Let's hold them to the DNA testing of these things, if it's a fox or a coyote I want to know.

And for a comparison, here is a fully furred fox with his bushy tail

Facts on global warming

Global warming has so many implications for industries and government, besides being an environmental issue, that there are powerful forces on all sides trying to convince us of one reality or another. You can only know the truth by digging it up for yourself. Here are some helps in that direction.



1. I just finished reading "The discovery of Global Warming" by Spencer Weart. (Harvard Univ. Press, 2003) This is an account of the history of the subject, written from an expert viewpoint, but fairly balanced. Weart is the director of the Center for History of Physics at the American Institute of Physics--great credentials. This is a great book, but won't tell you details of the science, just how various evidence has fit together over time. It's quite an eye-opener. Only a year old, it is already out of date on technical grounds. You can probably check out this book in a college library, I did.



2. A big sticking point among some "professionals" has been the publications of John Christy (U. of Alabama, Huntsville) which have shown no warming trends in satellite measurements of atmospheric temperature. His measurements have been a great comfort to the present Republican administration, which abandoned the Kyoto agreements that the U.S. had helped to forge. Christy's work is now being seriously challenged by two recent publications that show large warming trends based on satellite data. (If interested, I think you can get a recent Christy paper on-line: John R. Christy et al. "Update on Microwave-based Atmospheric Temperatures from UAH" 15th Symposium on Global Change and Climate Variations. 2003) Christy has a web site: john.christy@nsstc.uah.edu. Following are the challenging references.



3. Qiang Fu et el., "Contribution of Stratospheric Cooling to Satellite-inferred Tropospheric Temperature Trends" Nature 429, 55-58 (6 May 2004). Fu says that Christy overlooked the influence of tropospheric cooling in his calculations. He makes the correction, and finds a large warming trend. This appears to be a hot topic right now. Hard copies of this issue may not have reached library shelves yet, but a helpful librarian can download the paper for you.



4. Menglin Jin, "Analysis of Land Skin Temperature Using AVHRR Observations" Bul. of the American Meteorological Soc. (BAMS) April, 2004, p. 587-600. Jin analyzes satellite data to obtain earth surface temperature. He also shows a large warming trend. This is a major paper, lots of references. Most of the figures are in color, good luck getting it copied.



Final word: It can be shown logically that a warming earth does not necessary cause the upper troposphere to get warmer, as Christy would argue. I will provide this in a future post.



Ernie Rogers